Skip Navigation LinksReferenceMaterials

Reference Materials

Reference Materials

Here are a number of documents and links to Internet sites which contain information and/or other links related to ACCE Reference Materials. Please read our disclaimer.

*Members login required to view or download this material

There are no items to show in this view.

Student Papers

Analysis of the Return on Investment after the Implementation of the RFID System at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein 2024 International Undergraduate Division Winner: Antonio Carlos de Andrade Moreno, Student at Centro de Ensino Einstein, Brazil. Health care costs in Brazil continue to increase over the last decade and the inefficient management of medical technologies is one of the factors that has contributed to this high cost. On the other hand, there is a growing appreciation of technologies that help in the management of the technological park of hospitals. In this context, radio frequency identification (RFID) technology becomes essential for the management of hospital assets, allowing their real-time identification and the management of their information. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, in 2017, began studies for the implementation of the system, being implemented only in 2021, undergoing several feasibility and investment studies. The high investment in the RFID system is one of the factors that inhibit health institutions in Brazil from investing in this technology. Mobile assets benefiting the most from RFID technology were then selected within these variables. However, the return on investment (ROI) for RFID technology and its impact are based on the specifics of each healthcare organization and there is no standard methodology to assess this impact, but it is possible to project the gains and cost-benefit in a concrete way. The variables used in the ROI methodology were asset search time, shrinkage  rates, utilization rates,  and RFID implementation costs. This study highlights important RFID asset management techniques and characteristics for hospitals to consider when determining their own financial viability with respect to RFID implementation. A full return on investment was achieved in just 10 months after the overall deployment of the system. Keywords: RFID, Asset Management, Return on Investment. (504Kb, 3/25/2024)
 
Safety Verification Procedure in the Implementation of Alternative Equipment Maintenance at The Ottawa Hospital US/Canada Master Division Winner: Maryam Sangargir, Graduate Student at University of Ottawa, Canada. The paper describes The Ottawa Hospital's (TOH) adoption of Alternative Equipment Maintenance (AEM) in response to challenges managing a vast array of medical devices. Traditional reliance on Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) recommendations resulted in diminishing Preventive Maintenance (PM) completion rates, prompting the need for alternative strategies.   TOH's AEM methodology entails establishing an AEM committee, conducting eligibility assessments, and calculating an Equipment Management Number (EM#) based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. AEM's primary objective is highlighted as the enhancement of patient safety alongside the efficient use of resources. The adjustment of PM schedules through AEM is underscored as a valuable strategy to elevate completion rates and actively involve biomedical technologists in decision-making processes. The paper proposes potential refinements in scoring criteria and advocates for the continuous expansion of AEM projects across healthcare institutions. (381Kb, 3/25/2024)
 
Strategic Budget Planning for Complex Medical Devices: A Case Study on Surgical Microscopes 2023 Student Paper US/Canada Master Division Winner: Ms. Simi Nazeri, Graduate Student at University of Ottawa, Canada (453 KB, 4/13/2023)
 
Development of a Vein Detection Imaging System 2023 Student Paper US/Canada Graduate Division Winner: Mr. Kordell Mitchell Tan, Graduate Student at University of North Dakota (427 KB, 4/13/2023)
 
Building a clinical engineering department: A novel metric-based approach to staffing and workload balancing 2022 Student Paper US/Canada Master Division Winner: Christopher Gray, Graduate Student at University of Ottawa, Canada (598 KB, 5/20/2022)
 
Remote Video Monitoring for High-Risk Patients  2021 Student Paper US/Canada Master Division Winner: Eden D'Souza, E.I.T., Graduate Student at Carleton College, Canada (247 Kb, 4/12/2021)
 
2020 Student Paper US/Canada Master Program Division Winner: Biomedical Eng. Dept. Staff Productivity Analysis 2020 Student Paper US/Canada Master Division Winner: Ms. Payal Mandot, graduate student at University of Ottawa (1.23 MB, 3/20/2020)
 
2020 Student Paper US/Canada Doctorate Division Winner: Bed Control Process Standardization at a County Hospital 2020 Student Paper US/Canada Doctorate Division Winner: Ms. Priyanka Upendra, Graduate student at Capella University (977 Kb, 3/19/2020)
 

Professional Practices/Guidelines

ACCE Clinical Engineering Certification: Application and Examination Process, a step-by-step overview by BOK Committee A step-by-step overview of the Certification Application-Requirements-Examination process, by ACCE BOK Committee (940 KB, 4/28/2023)
 
Medical Equipment Quality Assurance: Inspection Program Development and Procedures, (2nd edition), Clark, Lane & Francoeur (login to read)*Medical Equipment Quality Assurance: Inspection Program Development and Procedures, (2nd edition), Clark, Lane & Francoeur (login to read) (5.6KB, 8/24/2022)
 
ACCE 2021 Body of Knowledge Survey Report The purpose of the Body of Knowledge (BOK) Survey was to develop the scope of practice for clinical engineers during their day-to-day work. The results were compiled and analyzed for use in designing the Clinical Engineering Certification Exam. The results will be used to ensure the certification exam closely matches the body of knowledge clinical engineers need to function in their jobs (825 KB, 5/23/2022)
 
ACCE comments on the Remanufacturing of Medical Devices; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability (09-22-2021) ACCE comments on FDA Docket# FDA-2018-N-3741.
Prepared by the task force members: Nader Hammoud, Blake Collins, Perry Kirwan, Juuso Leinonen, Priyanka Upendra and Binseng Wang, and approved by ACCE Board of Directors. (276 KB, 9/22/2021)
 
ACCE comments on the Discussion Paper: Strengthening Cybersecurity Practices Associated with Servicing of Medical Devices: Challenges and Opportunities  ACCE comments on FDA Docket#FDA-2021-N-0561. Prepared by the task force members: Juuso Leinonen, Blake Collins, Nader Hammoud, Perry Kirwan,  Priyanka Upendra and Binseng Wang, and approved by ACCE Board of Directors. (225 KB, 9/22/2021)
 

White Papers

Disclaimer

ACCE is an informative portal linking to many documents (internal and external) and Websites on the World Wide Web. Although these links to the ACCE have been reviewed and selected by a committee and is intended as a resource site for our members, the presence of a link on the ACCE Website does not represent an endorsement of the site. The documents and sites that are listed within our site are individually responsible for the content and accuracy of the information found in their site.
The American College of Clinical Engineering is a 501 (c) (6) non-profit organization
2880 Bicentennial Pkwy, Ste 100 #249   Henderson, NV 89044   Phone: (610) 825-6067
© ACCE. All rights reserved